{"id":11103,"date":"2021-05-14T08:01:38","date_gmt":"2021-05-14T13:01:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/?p=11103"},"modified":"2021-05-14T09:01:29","modified_gmt":"2021-05-14T14:01:29","slug":"the-economy-where-weve-been-and-where-were-going","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/2021\/05\/14\/the-economy-where-weve-been-and-where-were-going\/","title":{"rendered":"The Economy \u2013 Where We\u2019ve Been and Where We\u2019re Going"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<blockquote style=\"text-align:center\" class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><strong><em>This article was originally a part of the <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/2021\/05\/14\/cbei-central-wisconsin-spring-2021-report\/\">Center for Business and Economic Insight Spring 2021 Presentation<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"960\" height=\"528\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei2020120514.jpg\" alt=\"The Economy \u2013 Where We\u2019ve Been and Where We\u2019re Going\" class=\"wp-image-11131\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei2020120514.jpg 960w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei2020120514-300x165.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei2020120514-768x422.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The United States is emerging from one of the most challenging and unique economic periods in its history. This challenging economic period was different from others. The economic downturn wasn\u2019t the result of financial market problems or other economic imbalances; it was due to a pandemic. Over a half million Americans lost their lives to COVID-19. Like other economic crises, if there is a problem, the problem needs to be fixed before the economy can return to its normal growth. Hopefully, the significant ramp-up in vaccinations that has occurred will make the virus a bad memory by the end of 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This report will provide a summary of what\u2019s been going on with the economy and financial markets as well as look forward to the challenges facing the United States beyond COVID-19.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Where We\u2019ve Been<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Economic Growth<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The decline in economic growth in\n2020 ranks as the fifth worst annual decline in GDP since the Great Depression.\nGDP declined -3.5% in 2020; this compares to a drop of -2.5% in 2009 during the\nfinancial crisis. The Great Depression accounts for three of the worst years\nfor economic declines, with 1932 as the worst year with a -12.9% drop in GDP. The\neconomic contraction following World War II accounted for the second worst\ndecline, with a GDP decrease of -11.6% in 1946.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Worst Declines in Annual U.S. GDP (<em>Source:\nBureau of Economic Analysis<\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li><strong>1932<\/strong> -12.9%<\/li><li><strong>1946<\/strong>&nbsp;-11.6%<\/li><li><strong>1930<\/strong>&nbsp;-8.5%<\/li><li><strong>1931<\/strong>&nbsp;-6.4%<\/li><li><strong>2020<\/strong>&nbsp;-3.5%<\/li><li><strong>2009<\/strong>&nbsp;-2.5%<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>After a temporary kick-up in economic growth in 2018\ndue to the tax cuts, the economy began slowing in 2019. When compared to\neconomic growth of the previous year, every quarter in 2019 had lower economic\ngrowth than the corresponding quarter of the previous year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"197\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-01-1024x197.jpg\" alt=\"Percent Change from Quarter One Year Ago - Real GDP\" class=\"wp-image-11105\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-01-1024x197.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-01-300x58.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-01-768x147.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-01.jpg 1687w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>That trend continued in 2020 but was greatly exacerbated by COVID-19. Quarterly growth was less in every quarter in 2020 relative to the prior year, with pandemic driven economic declines beginning in the second quarter. When comparing economic growth to the previous quarter of a year ago, the 2020 second quarter decline of -9.0% was the worst on record since the <em>Bureau of Economic Analysis<\/em> began tracking quarterly growth in 1947. Although the economy improved in the second half of 2020, third quarter and fourth quarter GDP still declined from the prior year, though the rates of decline fell. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Employment<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart below presents the magnitude of the drop in employment that occurred in 2020 due to COVID-19 and the subsequent recovery. The drop in employment was much greater than what occurred during the financial crisis. Prior to the financial crisis, nonfarm employment peaked at 138.4 million in January 2008 before bottoming out at 129.7 million in February 2010. The decline in jobs lasted slightly over two years with a loss of approximately 8.7 million jobs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Following the financial crisis, employment\ngrew steadily and consistently from 129.7 million in February 2010 to 152.5\nmillion in February 2020. The employment growth lasted 10 years with\napproximately 22.8 million jobs added to the economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>During the financial crisis, employment bottomed out at 129.7 million. The onslaught of COVID-19 caused employment to drop to almost the same level in early 2020. The difference between the two downturns was the speed and magnitude of the declines. During the financial crisis, <em>8.7 million<\/em> jobs were lost over <em>two years<\/em>. During COVID-19, <em>22.3 million<\/em> jobs were lost over <em>two months<\/em>. Prior to the effects of COVID-19 on the economy, employment peaked at 152.5 million in February 2020. Two months later, employment dropped to 130.2 million. By April 2020 employment had declined by approximately 22.3 million. Employment gradually recovered beginning in May 2020, reaching 144 million in March 2021. Despite the increase of approximately 14 million jobs since April 2020, the March 2021 employment was still over 8 million fewer jobs than the employment peak in February 2020. The chart below shows the roller coaster for employment from January 2020 through March 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>All Employees, nonfarm Payrolls (seasonally adjusted)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"484\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/Bahr-chart1-1024x484.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-11106\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/Bahr-chart1-1024x484.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/Bahr-chart1-300x142.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/Bahr-chart1-768x363.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/Bahr-chart1.jpg 1300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption><em>Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Poverty<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>An incredibly unfortunate side effect of COVID-19 was the dramatic impact the economic decline had on poverty rates in the United States, particularly among Black and Latino individuals, where poverty rates were already disproportionately high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The U.S. Census Bureau uses a set of income\nthresholds that vary by family size and age of family members to determine who\nis in poverty. The thresholds are updated annually for inflation and apply\nthroughout the United States. Selected 2020 Poverty Thresholds by age and\nfamily size are listed in the table below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Selected 2020 Poverty Thresholds by Age and Family size<\/strong><br><em>Source: U.S. Census Bureau<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<table class=\"wp-block-table\"><tbody><tr><td>\n  One\n  Person Under Age 65\n  <\/td><td>\n  $13,465\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  One Person Aged 65 and Older\n  <\/td><td>\n  $12,413\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  Two Person Household Under Age 65\n  <\/td><td>\n  $17,331\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  Two Person Household Aged 65 and Older\n  <\/td><td>\n  $15,644\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  Family of Three \u2013 1 Child\n  <\/td><td>\n  $20,832\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  Family of Four \u2013 2 Children\n  <\/td><td>\n  $26,246\n  <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n<p>The impact on COVID-19 on poverty in the U.S. was swift and devastating. According to research by the <em>Center on Budget and Policy Priorities<\/em>, from February to June 2020:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The number of non-elderly individuals living in families with combined weekly earnings below the poverty line rose by 14.1 million (28 percent), from 51.0 million to 65.1 million.<\/li><li>The number of non-elderly Black and Latino individuals with below-poverty family earnings rose by 3.6 million (40 percent) and 4.0 million (34 percent), respectively. Among non-elderly, non-Latino whites, the increase was 4.4 million (17 percent).<\/li><li>The number of children in families with below-poverty earnings rose by 4.9 million (34 percent), from 14.4 million to 19.4 million.<ul><li>increased by 10.8 percentage points among Black individuals, from 26.9 percent to 37.7 percent,<\/li><li>increased by 7.8 percentage points among Latino individuals, from 22.9 percent to 30.6 percent,<\/li><li>increased by 3.2 percentage points among non-Latino white individuals, from 17.7 percent to 20.8 percent.<\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The speed and severity of the impact of COVID-19 on the U.S economy is unfortunately demonstrated by the ramp up in poverty that occurred over only a 5-month period, from February to June 2020. Particularly hit hard were Black and Latino individuals, many of whom were already struggling financially.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>The Stock Market<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Economic growth, employment, and poverty rates\nreflect what is currently going on the economy. The financial markets,\nparticularly the stock market, reflect what is expected to happen to the economy\nin the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Stock prices generally reflect expectations for the economy. If the economy grows, corporate profits generally increase, and stock prices increase. Despite the declines in economic growth throughout 2020, after the first quarter of 2020, the U.S. stock market focused on expected post-COVID economic growth. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The table below shows the quarterly returns of three\nmajor U.S. stock indexes: 1) the S&amp;P 500 \u2013 a diversified index that\nmeasures the stock performance of 500 relatively large companies (it is a\n\u201clarge-cap\u201d index, generally comprised of&nbsp;\ncompanies having a total stock value exceeding $10 billion), 2) the\nNASDAQ \u2013 an index comprised of over 3000 companies listed on the NASDAQ stock\nexchange and heavily weighted toward technology, and 3) the Russell 2000 \u2013 a\ndiversified index that measures the stock performance of 2000 relatively small\ncompanies (it is a \u201csmall-cap\u201d index, generally comprised of companies having a\ntotal stock value less than $2 billion). For comparative purposes, the long-run\naverage annual return (since 1926) on large-cap stocks is approximately 12\npercent; on small-cap stocks, 16%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"197\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-02-1024x197.jpg\" alt=\"Quarterly Returns U.S. Stock Market 2020 Q1 \u2013 2021 Q1\" class=\"wp-image-11107\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-02-1024x197.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-02-300x58.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-02-768x147.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-02.jpg 1687w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption><em>Source: Morningstar<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>All three indexes significantly declined in the first quarter of 2020. The Russell 2000 (small-cap index) had the steepest drop at -30.89 percent. The S&amp;P 500 (large-cap index) declined -20.00 percent, while the NASDAQ (technology index) fell -14.18 percent. Following the first quarter of 2020, it was up, up, and away for the all the stock indexes as the market looked forward to a post-COVID economic rebound. In the second quarter, the increase in the NASDAQ more than doubled the losses of the first quarter, as the NASDAQ was up 30.63 percent. The S&amp;P 500 and Russell 2000 were up 19.95 and 25.00 percent, respectively, both almost fully recovering the losses of the first quarter. Strong increases continued for each of the indexes for the remainder of 2020. For the full year, the S&amp;P 500 increased 16.26 percent and the Russell 2000 was up 18.36 percent, both higher than their historical average annual return. The NASDAQ increased an astounding 43.64 percent. All indexes increased once again in the first quarter of 2021, with the NASDAQ cooling down from its remarkable run in 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Following the 2020 first quarter, the stock market was clearly looking ahead to a post-COVID economic recovery. Pent-up demand, declining unemployment, low interest rates, and the multiple fiscal stimulus programs painted a very positive picture for economic growth based on stock market performance. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For further information:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>GDP Growth (and other national data) from the Bureau of Economic Analysis: <a href=\"https:\/\/apps.bea.gov\/iTable\/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&amp;step=2#reqid=19&amp;step=3&amp;isuri=1&amp;1921=survey&amp;1903=1\">GDP Growth<\/a><\/li><li>Info from the Bureau of Labor Statistics: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bls.gov\">www.bls.gov<\/a><\/li><li>Info from the U.S. Census Bureau: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/topics\/income-poverty\/poverty\/guidance\/poverty-measures.html\">How the Census Bureau Measures Poverty<\/a><\/li><li>From the <em>Center on Budget and Policy Priorities<\/em>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbpp.org\/research\/poverty-and-inequality\/research-note-number-of-people-in-families-with-below-poverty#:~:text=From%20February%20to%20June%202020,51.0%20million%20to%2065.1%20million\">Research Note: Number of People in Families With Below-Poverty Earnings Has Soared, Especially Among Black and Latino Individuals<\/a><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Where We\u2019re Going<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>The Economy<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Since early 2020, the economy has been about COVID-19. If the pandemic could become a distant bad memory, economic growth would consistently return. After the first quarter of 2020, the stock market was already predicting a strong economic rebound after the pandemic. The major question was when, not if, that would occur. In early 2021, following the significant increase of vaccinations and multiple fiscal stimulus programs, there was a growing list of positive economic signs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Economic Growth &#8211; Finally, in the first quarter of 2021, after a string of eight consecutive quarters in which GDP growth was lower relative to the prior year quarter, GDP growth increased. First quarter 2021 GDP growth was estimated at 0.4% compared to the first quarter 2020 GDP growth of 0.3%.<\/li><li>Retail and food sales &#8211; according to the <em>U.S. Census Bureau<\/em>, retail and food sales rebounded strongly in March 2021. Initial estimates were that March 2021 retail and food sales increased 9.8 percent from February 2021 and were up 27.7 percent from March 2020.&nbsp; Total sales for the January 2021 through March 2021 period were up approximately 14.3 percent from the same period a year ago. <\/li><li>First time unemployment insurance weekly claims &#8211; weekly unemployment claims continued to drop. According to the <em>U.S. Department of Labor<\/em>, for the period ending April 10 seasonally adjusted initial claims were at an estimated 576,000, a decrease of 193,000 from the prior week. This was the lowest level for initial claims since March 14, 2020, when it was 256,000. <\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The United States economy typically chugs along at a pretty good pace unless there is a bump or shock to derail its progress. In 2020, the economic shock was a pandemic. Economic growth can get derailed by inflation (which leads to higher interest rates), a financial crisis, or even a pandemic. Following the onslaught of COVID-19, the challenge was to get the economy moving forward again. Economic numbers from the first quarter of 2021 indicate that the economy is moving forward once again. That growth should continue until the next bump or shock occurs \u2013 be it from a pandemic recurrence or some other factor. Economic growth precipitates a snowballing effect, where economic growth continues until something happens to stop it. When economic growth occurs, increased employment leads to more consumer spending, which leads to more economic growth. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After four consecutive quarterly declines during the financial crisis, GDP increased in the fourth quarter of 2009 relative to the prior year quarter. Quarterly increases continued until COVID-19 hit the economy in the second quarter of 2020. The economic growth continued until the pandemic shock ended it. That\u2019s typical for a U.S. economic recovery \u2013 growth is generally consistent and continues until the next economic bump or shock. After three consecutive quarters of declines in GDP growth in 2020, GDP growth returned in the first quarter of 2021. That growth should continue until the next economic bump or shock. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>President Biden\u2019s Infrastructure (American\nJobs) Plan<\/em><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>On March 31 President Biden\nunveiled a $2 trillion wide-ranging infrastructure plan which would be\nimplemented over an eight-year timeframe. That plan would have a significant\nimpact on how economic growth occurs in the future. The plan includes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Transportation Infrastructure and Resilience<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>$115 billion to repair and rebuild bridges, highways, and roads,<\/li><li>$20 billion to increase road safety,<\/li><li>$85 billion to improve and expand public transit,<\/li><li>$80 billion to upgrade and expand railways, including both freight rail and Amtrak,<\/li><li>$174 billion for investing in electric vehicles, <\/li><li>$25 billion to upgrade airports,<\/li><li>$17 billion to upgrade inland waterways and ports,<\/li><li>$20 billion to reconnect urban neighborhoods cut off by highways,<\/li><li>$25 billion for projects to support regional economies,<\/li><li>$50 billion to improve infrastructure resilience,<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Power Grid, Internet, and Water Systems<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>$45 billion to replace nation\u2019s lead pipes,<\/li><li>$66 billion to upgrade water systems in rural areas,<\/li><li>$100 billion to expand high-speed broadband across the entire country, especially rural areas,<\/li><li>$100 billion to expand and improve power grid and expand clean energy,<\/li><li>$10 billion investment for new Corps of Americans to work conserving public lands and water.<\/li><li>$16 billion for plugging oil and gas wells and restoring abandoned mines,<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Housing, Schools, Workforce Development<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>$400\nbillion toward expanding home and community-based care for the elderly and\npeople with disabilities,<\/li><li>$213\nfor expanding affordable housing options,<\/li><li>$112\nbillion for schools and community college construction,<\/li><li>$25\nbillion to expand and upgrade available child-care facilities,<\/li><li>$28\nbillion for VA hospitals and government buildings,<\/li><li>$100\nbillion in workforce development for underserved groups,<\/li><li>$300\nbillion for domestic manufacturing, R&amp;D, pandemic preparedness, and small\nbusiness.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Taxes, Deficits, Debt, and Inflation<\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The $2 trillion infrastructure plan would be\nfinanced primarily through an increase in corporate taxes. The statutory (legal) corporate tax\nrate was lowered from 35% to 21% in 2018. The 35% rate had been in place since\n1993; the 21% rate is the lowest since prior to World War II. The statutory tax\nrate is the legal percentage established by law. Lowering the statutory rate\ncertainly lowers the taxes paid by a company. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the\n<em>effective<\/em> corporate tax rate, the rate that a company actually pays on\npre-tax profits, can be much lower than the statutory tax rate due to tax\ncredits and deductions. A 2019 study by the <em>Institute on Taxation &amp;\nEconomic Policy <\/em>examined the 2018 effective tax rate for 379 profitable\nfirms included in the Fortune 500. For the 379 companies, the study analyzed\nthe effective U.S. income tax rates on their pretax U.S. profits in 2018. Their\nfindings included:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>On average, the 379 profitable corporations paid an effective federal income tax rate of 11.3 percent on 2018 U.S. income; 57 companies had an effective federal income tax rate that exceeded the statutory rate of 21%, while 322 companies had an effective rate below the statutory rate.<\/li><li>91 out of the 379 corporations paid no taxes on 2018 U.S. income; 56 companies had an effective federal income tax rate between 0% and 5%.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The Biden plan would increase the statutory corporate tax rate to 28%, impose a minimum tax rate of 15% on the book income of large corporations, and eliminate offshoring tax incentives. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If Congress approves the infrastructure plan, there\nis a reason why the plan is proposed to be financed primarily through taxes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When the U.S. government spends more on programs and\nservices than what it takes in through taxes, a budget deficit occurs. In 2020,\ndue to the impact of the pandemic and the needed fiscal stimulus programs, the\nU.S. budget deficit hit a record $3.1 trillion, more than twice the level of\nthe $1.4 trillion deficit that occurred in 2009 during the financial crisis. To\nfinance a budget deficit the U.S. government borrows money from the public\nthrough the issuance of U.S. government debt securities called U.S. Treasury\nsecurities. Buyers include individuals, institutional investors, certain mutual\nfunds, and foreign investors and governments. The record 2020 budget deficit also led to a record amount of U.S.\ngovernment debt outstanding, at nearly $28 trillion by the fourth quarter of\n2020. U.S. debt has also more than doubled since the financial crisis, with\nU.S. debt peaking at $11.5 trillion at the end of the financial crisis. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To better gauge its magnitude, the\namount of federal debt outstanding is often compared to the Gross Domestic\nProduct (GDP). GDP not only measures\noutput in the economy, it also reflects income. When goods and services are\ncreated, income is also created, split between individuals, corporations, and\nthe government. Federal debt as a percentage of GDP is a measure of a\ncountry\u2019s ability to pay its debt. Sort of. The more income, the more debt you\ncan generally afford. The U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio ballooned to a record 135% in\n2020, up from 105% in 2019. The 2020 mark was a record for the U.S.; the 135%\ncompares to 80% at the end of the financial crisis. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The difficult question to answer:\nWhen does the debt-to-GDP ratio become too high? That\u2019s the hard part; no one\nreally knows. Federal debt as a\npercentage of GDP provides a <em>rough<\/em> measure as to how the federal debt\nfinancially burdens the country. Increasing debt does lessen the financial\nflexibility for a country to a certain degree because it increases the\npotential for financially straining the country through higher interest and\nprincipal payments. However, there are a variety of factors in gauging how the\nfederal debt financially burdens the country. The debt-to-GDP is one factor,\nbut other factors include the Federal Reserve, inflation, and interest rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the United States, the Treasury\nwill issue debt to fund budget deficits. The Federal Reserve, which manages the\ncountry\u2019s money supply, can buy U.S. Treasury debt in the financial markets\n(and consequently lower the total debt outstanding). There is a potential\ndrawback. If the Federal Reserve buys too much debt, then inflation may\nincrease due to the increased money supply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By the end of 2020, federal debt\nheld by the Federal Reserve reached a record $5 trillion. This was\napproximately double the amount held at the end of 2019, and approximately 7\ntimes greater than the amount of federal debt held at the end of the financial\ncrisis. No doubt, the Federal Reserve has been buying Treasury debt, and a lot\nof it. The debt-to-GDP ratio peaked at 135% during the second quarter of 2020\nbut declined to 129% by year-end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Given the increasing money supply\nresulting from the Federal Reserve\u2019s purchase of Treasury debt, what has been\nthe impact on expected inflation? The stock market can provide a clue as to\nwhat is expected for economic growth; the bond market can provide a clue as to\nwhat is expected for inflation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A variety of factors affect\ninterest rates \u2013 inflation is one of those factors. Inflation and interest\nrates are related. An increase in expected inflation will be reflected by an\nincrease in interest rates, particularly medium and long-term interest rates. Investors\nwant to have a greater return than the rate of expected inflation. As a result,\nincreases in expected inflation will be reflected in the bond market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The\nchart below shows the Treasury yield curve on April 1, 2021 relative to one\nyear ago. The Treasury\nyield curve shows the interest rates on Treasury bonds with different\nmaturities \u2013 it shows relationship between short-term and long-term interest\nrates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"104\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-03-1024x104.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-11108\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-03-1024x104.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-03-300x31.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-03-768x78.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/05\/cbei20210415-03.jpg 1687w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Interest rates have increased slightly\nacross medium and long-term maturities. The interest rate on 5-year bonds\nincreased 53 basis points, from 0.37% to 0.90%. The interest rate on 20-year\nbonds increased 120 basis points, from 1.04% to 2.24%. The bond market appears\nto reflect a slight expected increase in inflation. However, interest rates\nacross all maturities are still at relatively low historical levels, with the\n30-year bond rate at only 2.34%. The significant increase in Treasury debt by\nthe Federal Reserve is currently not expected to significantly increase\ninflation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another issue with increasing the\nfederal deficit and total debt &#8211; the timing of the increase. Generally, during\nperiods of economic duress, deficits will increase as the government needs to\nspend money to counteract the economic downturn. In periods of economic\nexpansion, generally deficits should at least decrease as tax revenues\nincrease. If you can\u2019t reduce deficits in good economic periods, you never\nwill. A significant side effect of the 2018 tax cuts was to increase the budget\ndeficit in a period of economic growth. That set the stage for a significant increase\nin the budget deficit if anything went wrong with the economy \u2013 like it did.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2020, the stimulus programs were\ngoing to be financed with debt rather than taxes. The objective was to increase\nconsumer spending to help the economy recover. Raising any tax in 2020 was not\na viable or appropriate economic policy option when consumers and businesses\nwere struggling. The $2 trillion infrastructure plan is proposed to be financed\nwith primarily corporate taxes. It is expected that economic growth will return\nin 2021. The increase in economic growth should provide an opportunity to\nreduce the budget deficit through increased tax revenues. The debt-to-GDP ratio\nis relatively high; although there is no specific benchmark as to what is too\nhigh, a high ratio indicates any adverse movements in inflation and interest\nrates could significantly increase borrowing costs. As a result, the proposal\nis to not increase the deficit and debt in a period of economic growth and the\ndebt level is relatively high. The $2 trillion proposal in effect reallocates\nspending from primarily corporations to government infrastructure programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Summary<\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Economic optimism returns in 2021.\nThe 2020 stock market predicted an economic rebound, and economic indicators\nshow signs that is beginning to happen. Although uncertainty remains over the\npandemic, significant progress has been achieved in fighting the virus. The\npandemic was a medical and economic problem. Fixing the problem was crucial for\nan economic rebound. Economic growth is expected to return in 2021. Exactly how\nthat growth occurs in 2021 and beyond could be significantly impacted by the\npassage (or not) of President Biden\u2019s $2 trillion infrastructure plan. At the\nvery least, 2021 promises to be another interesting year economically and politically.\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For further information:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>From the U.S. Census Bureau: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/retail\/marts\/www\/marts_current.pdf\">U.S. Census Bureau &#8211; Retail Sales<\/a><\/li><li>From the U.S. Department of Labor: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dol.gov\/ui\/data.pdf\">Weekly Unemployment Claims<\/a><\/li><li>Details on the American Jobs Plan from the Whitehouse: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefing-room\/statements-releases\/2021\/03\/31\/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan\/\">The American Jobs Plan<\/a><\/li><li>From NPR: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2021\/04\/01\/983470782\/by-the-numbers-bidens-2-trillion-infrastructure-plan\">By the Numbers &#8211; the $2 Trillion Infrastructure Plan<\/a><\/li><li>U.S. Budget Surplus or Deficit from the Federal Reserve: <a href=\"https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/FYFSD\"><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/FYFSD\">https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/FYFSD<\/a><\/li><li>Major Holders of U.S. Treasury Securities from the U.S. Treasury: <a href=\"https:\/\/ticdata.treasury.gov\/Publish\/mfh.txt\">https:\/\/ticdata.treasury.gov\/Publish\/mfh.txt<\/a><\/li><li>U.S. Federal Debt from the Federal Reserve: <a href=\"https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/GFDEBTN\">https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/GFDEBTN<\/a><\/li><li>U.S. Federal Debt as a Percentage of GDP from the St. Louis Federal Reserve: <a href=\"https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/GFDEGDQ188S\">https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/GFDEGDQ188S<\/a><\/li><li>Federal debt held by the Federal Reserve: <a href=\"https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/FDHBFRBN\">https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/FDHBFRBN<\/a><\/li><li>From the U.S. Treasury: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.treasury.gov\/resource-center\/data-chart-center\/interest-rates\/pages\/TextView.aspx?data=yieldYear&amp;year=2021\">The Yield Curve<\/a><\/li><li>For a history of corporate tax rates, below is link for a spreadsheet history from the IRS: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irs.gov\/pub\/irs-soi\/histabb.xls\">Historical Table 24 &#8211; Internal Revenue Service<\/a><\/li><li>A discussion of the history of corporate tax rates and brackets from the Internal Revenue Service: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irs.gov\/pub\/irs-soi\/02corate.pdf\">Corporate Income Tax Brackets and Rates 1909 &#8211; 2002<\/a><\/li><li>From the <em>Institute on Taxation &amp; Economic Policy<\/em>: <a href=\"https:\/\/itep.sfo2.digitaloceanspaces.com\/121619-ITEP-Corporate-Tax-Avoidance-in-the-First-Year-of-the-Trump-Tax-Law.pdf\">Corporate Tax Avoidance in 2018<\/a><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text alignwide is-stacked-on-mobile has-background\" style=\"background-color:#a5a4a4;grid-template-columns:32% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-683x1024.jpg\" alt=\"Kevin Bahr\" class=\"wp-image-12217 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-683x1024.jpg 683w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-200x300.jpg 200w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-768x1152.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-1024x1536.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color\">Kevin Bahr is a professor emeritus of finance and chief analyst of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uwsp.edu\/business\/sentry-school-of-business-and-economics\/centers-and-outreach\/center-for-business-and-economic-insight\/\">Center for Business and Economic Insight<\/a> in the Sentry School of Business and Economics at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. <\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This article was originally a part of the Center for Business and Economic Insight Spring 2021 Presentation. The United States is emerging from one of the most challenging and unique economic periods in its history. This challenging economic period was different from others. The economic downturn wasn\u2019t the result of financial market problems or other [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":11131,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,7,527,12],"tags":[124,532,305,343,344],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11103"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/136"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11103"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11103\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11133,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11103\/revisions\/11133"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}