{"id":11475,"date":"2021-12-02T14:06:30","date_gmt":"2021-12-02T20:06:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/?p=11475"},"modified":"2021-12-06T15:03:15","modified_gmt":"2021-12-06T21:03:15","slug":"the-u-s-economy-like-nothing-that-youve-seen-part-2-labor-market","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/2021\/12\/02\/the-u-s-economy-like-nothing-that-youve-seen-part-2-labor-market\/","title":{"rendered":"The U.S. Economy: Like Nothing That You\u2019ve Seen Part 2\u2013Labor Market"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"960\" height=\"528\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/11\/cbei20211123.jpg\" alt=\"The U.S. Economy \u2013 Like Nothing That You\u2019ve Seen\" class=\"wp-image-11469\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/11\/cbei20211123.jpg 960w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/11\/cbei20211123-300x165.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/11\/cbei20211123-768x422.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Labor Market Overview<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>A collage of factors influenced the\nlabor market in 2021, with some of those factors likely to continue impacting\nthe labor market in 2022. The economic rebound of 2021 prompted a flurry of job\nopenings; however, those job openings were not always filled, and talk of a\n\u201clabor shortage\u201d resulted. First, an overview of the labor market is presented\nfollowed by a discussion of factors affecting the labor market. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Employment <\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart below shows the roller coaster for U.S. employment from January 2020 through October 2021. Prior to the effects of COVID-19 on the economy, U.S. employment peaked at 152.5 million in February 2020. Two months later in April, employment dropped to 130.2 million. In two months, employment had declined by approximately 22.3 million jobs. 20.7 million jobs were lost in April; the magnitude of the job loss was unprecedented. It was most significant drop in monthly employment since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking monthly changes in employment in 1939. Prior to 2020, the biggest drop in monthly employment was approximately 800,000 jobs in March 2009, almost 20 million less than the number of jobs lost in April 2020. Prior to the financial crisis, nonfarm employment peaked at 138.4 million in January 2008 before bottoming out at 129.7 million in February 2010. During the financial crisis, approximately <em>8.7 million <\/em>jobs were lost over <em>two years<\/em>. During the COVID crisis in 2020, <em>22.3 million<\/em> jobs were lost over <em>two months<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Since May 2020, employment has\nconsistently recovered. The June 2020 addition of 4.8 million jobs was the\nlargest gain since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking monthly\nchanges in employment in 1939. Prior to 2020, the biggest increase in monthly\nemployment was approximately 540,000 jobs in May 2010, over 4 million less than\nthe number of jobs added in June 2020. In 2021, a resurgence of COVID\ncontributed at least partially to a summer slowdown in employment growth.\nBetween May and July approximately 1 million jobs were added to the U.S.\neconomy. Between July and September, approximately 0.6 million jobs were added.\nHowever, employment growth increased strongly in October as 531,000 jobs were added,\nand employment reached 148.3 million. Since employment growth returned in May\n2020, over 18 million jobs have been added back to the economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>All Employees, nonfarm Payrolls (seasonally adjusted)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"900\" height=\"374\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202a.png\" alt=\"All Employees, nonfarm Payrolls (seasonally adjusted)\" class=\"wp-image-11476\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202a.png 900w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202a-300x125.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202a-768x319.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" \/><figcaption><em>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Unemployment Rate<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Changes in the unemployment rate\nover the course of the business cycle in normal times typically occur\ngradually, often characterized by persistence and momentum. Persistence means\nthe variable will slowly gravitate to a historical average; momentum means the\nvariable will continually move in the same direction for a period of time.\nNeither happened in 2020. The unemployment rate was volatile, moving significantly,\nrapidly, and in opposite directions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart below shows the U.S.\nunemployment rate since January 2020. The onset of COVID in 2020 caused the\nunemployment rate to skyrocket from a pre-COVID low of 3.5% in February 2020 to\na peak of 14.8% in April, a two-month increase of 11.3%.&nbsp; The 10.4% increase that occurred in April was\nthe largest monthly increase based on available Bureau of Labor Statistics data\nsince 1948. Prior to 2020, the largest monthly increase in the unemployment\nrate was only 0.7% in April 1958. During the COVID crisis in 2020, the <em>unemployment\nrate increased 11.3% over two-months<\/em>. During the financial crisis, the <em>unemployment\nrate increased 5.6% over 29 months<\/em>, from a 2007 low of 4.4% in May to a\npeak of 10.0% in October 2009. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Beginning in May 2020, the\nunemployment rate began a consistent downward trend and reached 6.7% by year end.\nStrong job gains in October 2021 led to a further drop in the unemployment rate\nto 4.6%. In approximately a year and a half, the unemployment rate declined\nover 10%. The 8.1% drop that occurred in the unemployment rate from April\nthrough December 2020 was unprecedented. Prior to 2020, the largest drop in the\nunemployment rate that occurred during a given year was 2.1% in 1983. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Although the overall unemployment\nrate has declined, differences in rates remain for major worker groups. The\nunemployment rate in October was 4.3 percent for adult men, 4.4 percent for adult\nwomen, and 11.9 percent for adult teenagers. The unemployment rate was 4.0\npercent for Whites, 7.9 percent for Blacks, 4.2 percent for Asians, and 5.9\npercent for Hispanics. In 2020, the unemployment rate for persons with a\ndisability continued to be much higher than the rate for those without a\ndisability, rising to 12.6 percent. In addition to employment challenges,\nunfortunately Social Security rules are restrictive and significantly limit the\namount of income and assets that a disabled person may have. Exceeding those\nlimits means risking losing benefits \u2013 including healthcare. Even part-time\nemployment could cause a disabled person to lose Social Security benefits,\ndespite an employer not offering health insurance. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Unemployment\nRate (16 yrs. and older)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"900\" height=\"424\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202b.png\" alt=\"Unemployment Rate \" class=\"wp-image-11477\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202b.png 900w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202b-300x141.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202b-768x362.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" \/><figcaption><em>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Labor Market and \u201cLabor\nShortage\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Employment growth and the decline\nin the unemployment rate have been extensive since April 2020 when the negative\nimpacts of COVID on the economy peaked. Although employment growth has been\nsignificant, there were still approximately 4 million fewer employed in October\n2021 than in February 2020. Despite the decrease in employment, \u201clabor\nshortages\u201d have been discussed as many businesses have not been able to hire desired\nemployees. Next, a discussion of factors potentially affecting the labor market\nand \u201clabor shortages\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Extended Unemployment Benefits<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In March 2020 the Coronavirus Aid,\nRelief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was passed by Congress and became\nlaw. The CARES Act established the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation program,\nwhich provided an additional $600 per week to individuals who were collecting\nregular unemployment insurance benefits. The additional $600 payment ended in\nJuly 2020, but in January 2021 the program was partially reinstated, with an additional\n$300 payment that was scheduled to end in March 2021. &nbsp;The American Rescue Plan, passed in March\n2021, extended federal unemployment programs, including the $300 additional\npayment, through September 4, 2021. However, states could opt out of the\nextended benefit program. In an attempt to incentivize workers to return to\nwork, 26 states ended the federal benefit before September, with 22 states\nending the program in June.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Did ending the benefits early\nprompt a flood of workers to return to work? No, according to multiple studies.\n\u201c<em>Early Withdrawal of Pandemic Unemployment Insurance: Effects on Earnings,\nEmployment and Consumption<\/em>\u201d from a team of economists and researchers at Columbia\nUniversity (K. Coombs and S. Naidu), Harvard University (C. Janke and R.\nKluender), the University of Massachusetts Amherst (A. Dube), and the\nUniversity of Toronto (M. Stepner) concluded that ending the unemployment\nbenefits early provided only a relatively small increase in employment relative\nto states that did not end benefits. However, the resulting decrease in\nconsumer spending that resulted from 7 out of 8 people <em>not<\/em> finding\nemployment caused a drastic decline in consumer spending and lowered state\neconomic growth from what would have occurred if benefits did not end. The\nbottom line \u2013 ending the unemployment benefits early did not result in a\nsignificant return to work for the unemployed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UKG, a payroll and time management\nfirm, compared data of states that ended unemployment benefits early relative\nto states that did not end benefits. The UKG data showed that states ending\nadditional federal unemployment benefits grew workforce activity among hourly\nemployees at a <em>lower<\/em> rate of growth relative to states that continued\nthe additional benefit. The extension of unemployment benefits was not the\nprimary reason that people did not return to the workforce. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Job Openings<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>As the economy recovered in 2021, the\nnumber of U.S. job openings skyrocketed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The chart below shows the number of\nU.S. monthly job openings since 2000. Looking at the number of U.S. monthly job\nopenings since 2000 provides a picture of how significant the number of job\nopenings has been recently. Prior to 2014, the number of monthly job openings\nwas generally below 5 million. Following the end of the financial crisis in\n2009 an expanding economy contributed to monthly job openings gradually\nincreasing from approximately 2.2 million in July 2009 to a pre-COVID peak of\nnearly 7.6 million in October 2018. As economic growth slowed in 2019 the\nnumber of monthly job openings declined consistently to a yearly low of 6.7\nmillion in December. The number of monthly openings dropped precipitously in\nearly 2020 due to COVID to a low of 4.6 million in April 2020 before increasing\nlater in the year. By December 2020, the number job openings was approximately\nequal to the number of job openings one year earlier. The number of job\nopenings had increased by over 2 million from a COVID low of 4.6 million in\nApril 2020 to over 6.7 million in December. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, in 2021 the number of\nmonthly job openings exploded to record levels. The number of job openings in\nJuly 2021 was slightly greater than 11.0 million, an increase of 4.3 million\njob openings (64%) from the December 2020 level. Although the number of job\nopenings slightly declined after July, the number of job openings remained\nstrong. &nbsp;The number of job openings\ntotaled just under 10.5 million in September, down from the record high 11.0\nmillion in July. This compares to a pre-COVID high of 7.6 million job openings\nin November 2018. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>U.S. Monthly Job Openings 2000 through September 2021<\/strong> <strong>(thousands)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"888\" height=\"384\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202c.png\" alt=\"U.S. Monthly Job Openings \" class=\"wp-image-11478\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202c.png 888w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202c-300x130.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202c-768x332.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 888px) 100vw, 888px\" \/><figcaption><em>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The record level of job openings contributed\nto the \u201clabor shortage\u201d. The number was more than twice the level of job openings\nthat occurred in any year between 2000 and 2014, and approximately 40% greater\nthan the peak of job openings that occurred during 2018 before the pandemic. <strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Quit Rate<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Record levels of job\nopenings?&nbsp; \u201cHold my beer\u201d replies the 2021 quit rate. The graph below\nshows the quit rate for the United States since the turn of the century through\nSeptember 2021. The quit rate is the number of people quitting jobs during the\nentire month as a percent of total employment. That rate reached a record high 3.0%\nin September 2021. For seven consecutive months, from March 2021 through September\n2021, the quit rate was higher than any month this century prior to March 2021.\nMore Americans had it with their job and called it quits in 2021 than at any\nother time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There were likely a myriad of\nfactors contributing to the high quit rate, including:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Job Openings. The record number of job openings meant that employees could quit and reassess their job, career, and work environment and likely find a job when they decided to return to work.<\/li><li>Wages. Want a raise? Average hourly earnings have increased by 4.9 percent for the 12-month period ending October 31, 2021. Although wages have generally increased, in some cases getting a raise was easier by quitting than staying in the same job. In some occupations, new hires could get paid more than employees with more experience.<\/li><li>COVID resurgence. The summer resurgence of COVID meant some workers faced an increased risk of contracting the virus if they remained in their current job, either from customers or coworkers. <\/li><li>Job stress or work conditions. Certainly, many workers experience job stress, but arguably health care workers led the way in dealing with significantly more of it since the onslaught of COVID.<\/li><li>Unruly customer behavior. Unfortunately, not all jobs and occupations receive the respect they deserve. From retail, to healthcare, to education, job incidents increased. Airlines provide an unfortunate example. Through early November, the Federal Aviation Administration indicated that the number of investigations initiated regarding unruly passenger behavior was more than twice the level of any previous year.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The\nQuit Rate<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"900\" height=\"450\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202d.png\" alt=\"The Quit Rate\" class=\"wp-image-11479\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202d.png 900w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202d-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202d-768x384.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" \/><figcaption><em>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>No doubt the number of employees\nquitting contributed to the hiring woes of employers. The industries with the\ntop two quit rates in August and September 1) Leisure and hospitality\n(including food service), and 2) Retail trade. Generally, relatively low paid,\nhigh customer contact positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Workers Not in the Labor Force<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The table below compares the number\nof workers by age that opted to stay out of the workforce in October 2021\nrelative to October 2020. Who\u2019s not going back to work despite the record level\nof job openings? Older Americans. The number of workers opting to stay out of\nthe workforce for workers aged 16 \u2013 24 years and 25 \u2013 54 years <em>decreased<\/em>\nfor both groups. However, the number of workers opting to stay out of the work\nforce increased by over 1 million for workers aged 55 and older. Will older\nworkers rejoin the work force? Maybe, but early retirement might look pretty\ngood \u2013 particularly given recent stock market returns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Workers\nNot in the Work Force by Age (in thousands)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"114\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202e-1024x114.jpg\" alt=\"Workers Not in the Work Force by Age (in thousands)\" class=\"wp-image-11481\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202e-1024x114.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202e-300x33.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202e-768x85.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption><em>Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Stock Market Returns<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>For those workers with money\ninvested in the stock market (including retirement funds), things have been\nlooking pretty good.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The table\nbelow shows the quarterly returns of three major U.S. stock indexes: 1) the\nS&amp;P 500 \u2013 a diversified index that measures the stock performance of 500\nrelatively large companies (it is a \u201clarge-cap\u201d index, generally comprised\nof&nbsp; companies having a total stock value\nexceeding $10 billion), 2) the NASDAQ \u2013 an index comprised of over 3000\ncompanies listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange and heavily weighted toward\ntechnology, and 3) the Russell 2000 \u2013 a diversified index that measures the\nstock performance of 2000 relatively small companies (it is a \u201csmall-cap\u201d\nindex, generally comprised of companies having a total stock value less than $2\nbillion). For comparative purposes, the long-run average annual return (since\n1926) is approximately 12 percent on large-cap stocks and 16 percent on\nsmall-cap stocks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Since\n2019, stock market returns have generally been excellent. Even in 2020, when all\nthree indexes significantly declined in the first quarter due to the onset of\nCOVID, the stock market began looking forward to a post-COVID recovery. For the\nfull year, the S&amp;P 500 increased 16.26 percent and the Russell 2000 was up\n18.36 percent, both higher than their historical average annual return. The\nNASDAQ increased an amazing 43.64 percent. Through early November 2021, the\nyear-to-date returns once again remain strong, with each index increasing\napproximately 20%. Certainly, there have been ups and downs, but generally the\nmarket has been looking forward with an expectation for sound economic growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>U.S.\nStock Market Returns <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"171\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202f-1024x171.jpg\" alt=\"U.S. Stock Market Returns \" class=\"wp-image-11482\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202f-1024x171.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202f-300x50.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/12\/cbeichart20211202f-768x128.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption><em>Source: Morningstar<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>For workers invested in the stock\nmarket, that strong performance has provided some financial flexibility through\nincreased investment account balances, which in turn can affect the work\ndecision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Summary <\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The labor market and \u201clabor\nshortages\u201d have been impacted by a myriad of factors. The labor market remains\nstrong since it started recovering from the initial impacts of COVID in early\n2020 as consistent economic growth has returned. Job openings increased\nsignificantly in 2021. However, many businesses faced challenges in trying to hire\ndesired employees. Quit rates were at record levels in 2021 due to a variety of\nfactors, including a resurgence in COVID, the desire to avoid dealing with\nunruly customers, employees reassessing careers, job stress and work\nconditions, the relative ease of finding a new job, and the increased\npossibility of getting a raise if switching jobs or careers. Many Americans,\nparticularly older Americans (age 55 and older), have remained out of the labor\nforce.&nbsp; The decision to not return to the\nworkforce has been bolstered by the superior investment returns offered by the\nstock market since 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cLabor shortages\u201d may decrease but\nnot end in 2022.&nbsp; An expanding rather\nthan rebounding economy should decrease the volatility in job openings. Wages\nhave increased offering greater incentives for workers. However, certain trends\nin the labor market may not dissipate the \u201clabor shortages\u201d. Quit rates have\nincreased as workers have reassessed career options and older workers have left\nthe workforce. COVID has waned but has not ended. Impacts on the workforce will\nremain until it is eradicated. The post-COVID employment world may result in\nworkers desiring and demanding greater job flexibility.&nbsp; Structurally within the labor market, changes\ncould help alleviate some of the shortages. Increased wages, greater job\nflexibility, proper staffing to avoid job stress, and improved work\nenvironments would all contribute to greater worker satisfaction. In addition,\nregulatory changes could improve job market opportunities for people with\ndisabilities. \u201cLabor shortages\u201d create challenges; a continually changing and\nevolving labor market will require necessitated changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">For\nfurther information:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>Info from the Bureau of Labor Statistics:<ol><li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/\">Economic Situation<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/data.bls.gov\/timeseries\/LNS14000000\">Unemployment Rate<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/jlt\/\">Job Openings and Labor Turnover<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/data.bls.gov\/timeseries\/JTS000000000000000QUR\">Quit rate<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/news.release\/jolts.t04.htm\">Quit Rates by Industry<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/web\/empsit\/cpseea38.htm\">Persons not in the Labor Force<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/news.release\/pdf\/disabl.pdf\">Persons with a Disability &#8211; Labor Force Characteristics<\/a><\/li><li><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=013738036195919377644:6ih0hfrgl50&amp;q=https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/news.release\/pdf\/empsit.pdf&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwj-tJz9pPDzAhUiTTABHVzQCrsQFnoECAAQAg&amp;usg=AOvVaw15O96Cd7eBVBA8ZBU0CVZS\" target=\"_blank\">The&nbsp;Employment&nbsp;Situation-November 2021<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/data.bls.gov\/timeseries\/CES0000000001&amp;output_view=net_1mth\">All Employees, Nonfarm Payrolls<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/li><li>K. Coombs, A. Dube, C. Jahnke. R. Kluender, S. Naidu, M. Stepner, \u201cEarly Withdrawal of Pandemic Unemployment Insurance: Effects on Earnings, Employment and Consumption,\u201d Working Paper, August 2021,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/files.michaelstepner.com\/pandemicUIexpiration-paper.pdf\">https:\/\/files.michaelstepner.com\/pandemicUIexpiration-paper.pdf<\/a>.<\/li><li>Info from UKG: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ukg.com\/resources\/UKG-Workforce-Activity-Report-August-2021.pdf\">UKG Workforce Activity Report<\/a><\/li><li>From Morningstar, info on S&amp;P 500 performance and the financial markets: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.morningstar.com\/indexes\/spi\/spx\/quote\">S&amp;P 500 Returns<\/a><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text alignwide is-stacked-on-mobile has-background\" style=\"background-color:#a5a4a4;grid-template-columns:32% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-683x1024.jpg\" alt=\"Kevin Bahr\" class=\"wp-image-12217 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-683x1024.jpg 683w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-200x300.jpg 200w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-768x1152.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin-1024x1536.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2019\/11\/CPS-BusEcon-Bahr-Kevin.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color\">Kevin Bahr is a professor emeritus of finance and chief analyst of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uwsp.edu\/business\/sentry-school-of-business-and-economics\/centers-and-outreach\/center-for-business-and-economic-insight\/\">Center for Business and Economic Insight<\/a> in the Sentry School of Business and Economics at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. <\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignright is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/11\/cbei20211123.jpg\" alt=\"The U.S. Economy \u2013 Like Nothing That You\u2019ve Seen\" class=\"wp-image-11469\" width=\"300\" height=\"165\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/11\/cbei20211123.jpg 960w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/11\/cbei20211123-300x165.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/11\/cbei20211123-768x422.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CBEI Series: The U.S. Economy: Like Nothing That You\u2019ve Seen<\/strong><br><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/2021\/11\/23\/the-u-s-economy-like-nothing-that-youve-seen-part-1-economic-growth\/\">Part 1: Economic Growth<\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/2021\/12\/02\/the-u-s-economy-like-nothing-that-youve-seen-part-2-labor-market\/\">Part 2: Labor Market<\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/2021\/12\/06\/the-u-s-economy-like-nothing-that-youve-seen-part-3-inflation\/\">Part 3: Inflation<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Labor Market Overview A collage of factors influenced the labor market in 2021, with some of those factors likely to continue impacting the labor market in 2022. The economic rebound of 2021 prompted a flurry of job openings; however, those job openings were not always filled, and talk of a \u201clabor shortage\u201d resulted. First, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":11469,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,7,527],"tags":[532,305,343,344],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11475"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/136"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11475"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11475\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11499,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11475\/revisions\/11499"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.uwsp.edu\/cps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}